
The Best CIPP-E Exam Study Material and Preparation Test Question Dumps
Get Ready to Pass the CIPP-E exam Right Now Using Our Certified Information Privacy Professional Exam Package
NEW QUESTION # 53
Under Article 30 of the GDPR, controllers are required to keep records of all of the following EXCEPT?
- A. Incidents of personal data breaches, whether disclosed or not.
- B. Retention periods for erasure and deletion of categories of personal data.
Section: (none)
Explanation - C. Data inventory or data mapping exercises that have been conducted.
- D. Categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been disclosed.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 54
Which sentence BEST summarizes the concepts of "fairness," "lawfulness" and "transparency", as expressly required by Article 5 of the GDPR?
- A. Fairness refers to the security of personal data; lawfulness and transparency refers to the analysis of ordinances to ensure they are uniformly enforced.
- B. Fairness refers to limiting the amount of data collected from individuals; lawfulness refers to the approval of company guidelines by the state; transparency solely relates to communication of key information before collecting data.
- C. Fairness and transparency refer to the communication of key information before collecting data; lawfulness refers to compliance with government regulations.
- D. Fairness refers to the collection of data from diverse subjects; lawfulness refers to the need for legal rules to be uniform; transparency refers to giving individuals access to their data.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
NEW QUESTION # 55
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Due to rapidly expanding workforce, Company A has decided to outsource its payroll function to Company B. Company B is an established payroll service provider with a sizable client base and a solid reputation in the industry.
Company B's payroll solution for Company A relies on the collection of time and attendance data obtained via a biometric entry system installed in each of Company A's factories. Company B won't hold any biometric data itself, but the related data will be uploaded to Company B's UK servers and used to provide the payroll service. Company B's live systems will contain the following information for each of Company A's employees:
Name
Address
Date of Birth
Payroll number
National Insurance number
Sick pay entitlement
Maternity/paternity pay entitlement
Holiday entitlement
Pension and benefits contributions
Trade union contributions
Jenny is the compliance officer at Company A. She first considers whether Company A needs to carry out a data protection impact assessment in relation to the new time and attendance system, but isn't sure whether or not this is required.
Jenny does know, however, that under the GDPR there must be a formal written agreement requiring Company B to use the time and attendance data only for the purpose of providing the payroll service, and to apply appropriate technical and organizational security measures for safeguarding the data. Jenny suggests that Company B obtain advice from its data protection officer. The company doesn't have a DPO but agrees, in the interest of finalizing the contract, to sign up for the provisions in full. Company A enters into the contract.
Weeks later, while still under contract with Company A, Company B embarks upon a separate project meant to enhance the functionality of its payroll service, and engages Company C to help. Company C agrees to extract all personal data from Company B's live systems in order to create a new database for Company B.
This database will be stored in a test environment hosted on Company C's U.S. server. The two companies agree not to include any data processing provisions in their services agreement, as data is only being used for IT testing purposes.
Unfortunately, Company C's U.S. server is only protected by an outdated IT security system, and suffers a cyber security incident soon after Company C begins work on the project. As a result, data relating to Company A's employees is visible to anyone visiting Company C's website. Company A is unaware of this until Jenny receives a letter from the supervisory authority in connection with the investigation that ensues. As soon as Jenny is made aware of the breach, she notifies all affected employees.
Under the GDPR, which of Company B's actions would NOT be likely to trigger a potential enforcement action?
- A. Their decision to operate without a data protection officer.
- B. Their omission of data protection provisions in their contract with Company C.
- C. Their engagement of Company C to improve their payroll service.
- D. Their failure to provide sufficient security safeguards to Company A's data.
Answer: C
Explanation:
While Company B made several mistakes in handling Company A's employee data, not all of them would likely trigger a potential enforcement action under the GDPR. Here's an analysis of each option:
A) Omission of data protection provisions in the contract with Company C: This is a clear violation of the GDPR. Company B, as the data controller, is responsible for ensuring that any third-party processors comply with data protection requirements. By omitting data protection provisions in the contract, Company B failed to take appropriate steps to ensure the security and privacy of the personal data. This would be a likely trigger for an enforcement action.
B) Failure to provide sufficient security safeguards to Company A's data: This is another violation of the GDPR. Company B has a legal obligation to implement appropriate technical and organizational security measures to protect personal data from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. The outdated IT security system at Company C's U.S. server demonstrates a failure to meet this obligation. This would also be a likely trigger for an enforcement action.
C) Engagement of Company C to improve their payroll service: While outsourcing certain aspects of data processing is permitted under the GDPR, the data controller remains ultimately responsible for compliance. However, simply engaging another company to improve a service itself isn't necessarily a violation. As long as the proper safeguards are in place and the data processing is carried out in accordance with the GDPR, this action alone would not likely trigger an enforcement action.
D) Decision to operate without a data protection officer: The GDPR requires certain organizations to appoint a data protection officer (DPO). While Company B may be required to have a DPO depending on its size and activities, the absence of a DPO wouldn't automatically trigger an enforcement action. However, it could indicate a lack of compliance culture and contribute to other violations, increasing the likelihood of an enforcement action.
Therefore, while Company B made several mistakes, only the ones that directly violate specific data protection requirements, such as omitting data protection provisions in contracts or failing to implement appropriate security measures, are likely to trigger an enforcement action. Engaging a third-party to improve a service, as long as it's done in a compliant manner, isn't a violation in itself.
NEW QUESTION # 56
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Due to rapidly expanding workforce, Company A has decided to outsource its payroll function to Company B.
Company B is an established payroll service provider with a sizable client base and a solid reputation in the industry.
Company B's payroll solution for Company A relies on the collection of time and attendance data obtained via a biometric entry system installed in each of Company A's factories. Company B won't hold any biometric data itself, but the related data will be uploaded to Company B's UK servers and used to provide the payroll service. Company B's live systems will contain the following information for each of Company A's employees:
* Name
* Address
* Date of Birth
* Payroll number
* National Insurance number
* Sick pay entitlement
* Maternity/paternity pay entitlement
* Holiday entitlement
* Pension and benefits contributions
* Trade union contributions
Jenny is the compliance officer at Company A.
She first considers whether Company A needs to carry out a data protection impact assessment in relation to the new time and attendance system, but isn't sure whether or not this is required.
Jenny does know, however, that under the GDPR there must be a formal written agreement requiring Company B to use the time and attendance data only for the purpose of providing the payroll service, and to apply appropriate technical and organizational security measures for safeguarding the data. Jenny suggests that Company B obtain advice from its data protection officer. The company doesn't have a DPO but agrees, in the interest of finalizing the contract, to sign up for the provisions in full. Company A enters into the contract.
Weeks later, while still under contract with Company A, Company B embarks upon a separate project meant to enhance the functionality of its payroll service, and engages Company C to help. Company C agrees to extract all personal data from Company B's live systems in order to create a new database for Company B.
This database will be stored in a test environment hosted on Company C's U.S. server. The two companies agree not to include any data processing provisions in their services agreement, as data is only being used for IT testing purposes.
Unfortunately, Company C's U.S. server is only protected by an outdated IT security system, and suffers a cyber security incident soon after Company C begins work on the project. As a result, data relating to Company A's employees is visible to anyone visiting Company C's website. Company A is unaware of this until Jenny receives a letter from the supervisory authority in connection with the investigation that ensues. As soon as Jenny is made aware of the breach, she notifies all affected employees.
The GDPR requires sufficient guarantees of a company's ability to implement adequate technical and organizational measures. What would be the most realistic way that Company B could have fulfilled this requirement?
- A. Avoiding the use of another company's data to improve their own services.
- B. Hiring companies whose measures are consistent with recommendations of accrediting bodies.
- C. Vetting companies' measures with the appropriate supervisory authority.
- D. Requesting advice and technical support from Company A's IT team.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 57
A grade school is planning to use facial recognition to track student attendance. Which of the following may provide a lawful basis for this processing?
- A. The school places a notice near each camera.
- B. Processing is necessary for the legitimate interests pursed by the school.
- C. The school gets explicit consent from the students.
- D. A state law requires facial recognition to verify attendance.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 58
Which of the following is NOT a role of works councils?
- A. Determining whether to approve or reject certain decisions of the employer that affect employees.
- B. Determining the monetary fines to be levied against employers for data breach violations of employee data.
- C. Determining what changes will affect employee working conditions.
- D. Determining whether employees' personal data can be processed or not.
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 59
A news website based m (he United Slates reports primarily on North American events The website is accessible to any user regardless of location, as the website operator does not block connections from outside of the U.S. The website offers a pad subscription that requires the creation of a user account; this subscription can only be paid in U.S. dollars.
Which of the following explains why the website operator, who is the responsible for all processing related to account creation and subscriptions, is NOT required to comply with the GDPR?
- A. The website is not available in several official languages of European Un on Member States
- B. The website cannot block connections from outside the U.S. that use a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to simulate a US location.
- C. The controller does not have an establishment in the European Union.
- D. Payments cannot be made in a European Union currency.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The GDPR applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not1. This means that the GDPR applies to any controller or processor that has a branch, office, subsidiary, or other stable arrangement in the EU, even if the data processing occurs outside the EU. However, the GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to: (a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or (b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union1. This means that the GDPR applies to any controller or processor that targets or tracks EU data subjects, even if they do not have a presence in the EU. In this case, the website operator is not required to comply with the GDPR because it does not have an establishment in the EU (option B), and it does not offer goods or services or monitor the behaviour of EU data subjects. The website operator reports primarily on North American events, does not block connections from outside the U.S., and only accepts payments in U.S. dollars, which indicate that it does not intend to target or track EU data subjects. Therefore, option B is the correct answer. Reference: Art. 3 GDPR - Territorial scope, Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3), [What does territorial scope mean under the GDPR?]
NEW QUESTION # 60
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are U.S.-based multinational companies. They use an internet-based common platform for collecting and sharing their customer data with each other, in order to integrate their marketing efforts. Additionally, they agree on the data to be stored, how reservations will be booked and confirmed, and who has access to the stored data.
Mike, an EU resident, has booked travel itineraries in the past through XYZ Travel Agency to stay at ABC Hotel Chain's locations. XYZ Travel Agency offers a rewards program that allows customers to sign up to accumulate points that can later be redeemed for free travel. Mike has signed the agreement to be a rewards program member.
Now Mike wants to know what personal information the company holds about him. He sends an email requesting access to his data, in order to exercise what he believes are his data subject rights.
What are ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency's roles in this relationship?
- A. XYZ Travel Agency is the controller and ABC Hotel Chain is the processor.
- B. ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are independent controllers.
- C. ABC Hotel Chain is the controller and XYZ Travel Agency is the processor.
- D. ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are joint controllers.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 61
How is the GDPR's position on consent MOST likely to affect future app design and implementation?
- A. App developers' responsibilities as data controllers will increase.
- B. Users will be given granular types of consent for particular types of processing.
- C. App developers will expand the amount of data necessary to collect for an app's functionality.
- D. Users will see fewer advertisements when using apps.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The GDPR requires that consent must be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous1. This means that app developers must provide clear and transparent information about the purposes and legal basis of the data processing, and allow users to choose which types of processing they agree to and which they do not. For example, users should be able to consent separately to different types of cookies, such as functional, analytical or marketing cookies2. Users should also be able to withdraw their consent at any time as easily as they gave it1. Therefore, app design and implementation must take into account these requirements and provide users with granular and user-friendly consent options, rather than relying on pre-ticked boxes, implied consent or default settings3. Reference: 1 Art. 4 (11) and Art. 7 GDPR - Definitions and Conditions for consent - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)2 Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679 - European Data Protection Board3 How To Make Compliant GDPR Consent Forms (With Examples) - Termly.
NEW QUESTION # 62
What is the MAIN reason GDPR Article 4(22) establishes the concept of the "concerned supervisory authority"?
- A. To give corporations a choice about who their supervisory authority will be.
- B. To encourage the consistency of local data processing activity.
- C. To ensure the GDPR covers controllers that do not have an establishment in the EU but have a representative in a member state.
- D. To ensure that the interests of individuals residing outside the lead authority's jurisdiction are represented.
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to GDPR Article 4(22), a supervisory authority is concerned by the processing of personal data if the data subjects residing in its member state are substantially affected or likely to be substantially affected by the processing, or if a complaint has been lodged with it. This concept is mainly introduced to ensure that the rights and interests of data subjects are protected by the supervisory authorities that are closest to them, regardless of where the controller or processor is established or where the lead supervisory authority is located. The concerned supervisory authorities have the right to participate in the one-stop-shop and consistency mechanisms, and to express their views and objections on the draft decisions of the lead supervisory authority. They also have the duty to cooperate and assist each other in the performance of their tasks. Reference: GDPR Article 4(22), GDPR Article 60, GDPR Article 63, The role of the 'supervisory authority concerned' (Chapter 3.1 ...
NEW QUESTION # 63
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Joe started the Gummy Bear Company in 2000 from his home in Vermont, USA. Today, it is a multi-billion-dollar candy company operating in every continent. All of the company's IT servers are located in Vermont. This year Joe hires his son Ben to join the company and head up Project Big, which is a major marketing strategy to triple gross revenue in just 5 years. Ben graduated with a PhD in computer software from a top university. Ben decided to join his father's company, but is also secretly working on launching a new global online dating website company called Ben Knows Best.
Ben is aware that the Gummy Bear Company has millions of customers and believes that many of them might also be interested in finding their perfect match. For Project Big, Ben redesigns the company's online web portal and requires customers in the European Union and elsewhere to provide additional personal information in order to remain a customer. Project Ben begins collecting data about customers' philosophical beliefs, political opinions and marital status.
If a customer identifies as single, Ben then copies all of that customer's personal data onto a separate database for Ben Knows Best. Ben believes that he is not doing anything wrong, because he explicitly asks each customer to give their consent by requiring them to check a box before accepting their information. As Project Big is an important project, the company also hires a first year college student named Sam, who is studying computer science to help Ben out.
Ben calls out and Sam comes across the Ben Knows Best database. Sam is planning on going to Ireland over Spring Beak with 10 of his friends, so he copies all of the customer information of people that reside in Ireland so that he and his friends can contact people when they are in Ireland.
Joe also hires his best friend's daughter, Alice, who just graduated from law school in the U.S., to be the company's new General Counsel. Alice has heard about the GDPR, so she does some research on it. Alice approaches Joe and informs him that she has drafted up Binding Corporate Rules for everyone in the company to follow, as it is important for the company to have in place a legal mechanism to transfer data internally from the company's operations in the European Union to the U.S.
Joe believes that Alice is doing a great job, and informs her that she will also be in-charge of handling a major lawsuit that has been brought against the company in federal court in the U.S. To prepare for the lawsuit, Alice instructs the company's IT department to make copies of the computer hard drives from the entire global sales team, including the European Union, and send everything to her so that she can review everyone's information. Alice believes that Joe will be happy that she did the first level review, as it will save the company a lot of money that would otherwise be paid to its outside law firm.
As a result of Sam's actions, the Gummy Bear Company potentially violated Articles 33 and 34 of the GDPR and will be required to do what?
- A. Analyze and evaluate all of its breach notification obligations.
- B. Analyze and evaluate the liability for customers in Ireland.
- C. Notify its Data Protection Authority about the data breach.
- D. Notify all of its customers that reside in the European Union.
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to Articles 33 and 34 of the GDPR, the Gummy Bear Company potentially violated its breach notification obligations by allowing Sam to copy and use the personal data of its customers in Ireland without their consent or authorization. A personal data breach is defined as a breach of security leading to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, personal data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed (Article 4(12)). The Gummy Bear Company, as a data controller, is required to notify the competent supervisory authority of the personal data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons (Article 33(1)). The notification should include the nature of the personal data breach, the categories and approximate number of data subjects and personal data records concerned, the likely consequences of the personal data breach, and the measures taken or proposed to address the personal data breach (Article 33(3)). The Gummy Bear Company is also required to communicate the personal data breach to the affected data subjects without undue delay, if the personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons (Article 34(1)). The communication should describe the nature of the personal data breach and the measures taken or proposed to address the personal data breach (Article 34(2)).
Therefore, the Gummy Bear Company should analyze and evaluate all of its breach notification obligations, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the personal data breach, the type and sensitivity of the personal data involved, the potential impact and harm to the data subjects, and the applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions where the data subjects reside. The Gummy Bear Company should also document the personal data breach and the remedial actions taken, and cooperate with the supervisory authorities and the data subjects as required by the GDPR.
NEW QUESTION # 64
What is the key difference between the European Council and the Council of the European Union?
- A. The Council of the European Union has a degree of legislative power.
- B. The European Council focuses primarily on issues involving human rights.
- C. The European Council is comprised of the heads of each EU member state.
- D. The Council of the European Union is helmed by a president.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Section: (none)
Explanation
NEW QUESTION # 65
Under the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive of the EU, a government can carry out covert investigations involving personal data, as long it is set forth by law and constitutes a measure that is both necessary and what?
- A. Proportionate.
- B. DPA-approved.
- C. Prudent.
- D. Important.
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to the CIPP/E study guide, the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive (LED) is a piece of EU legislation that ensures the protection of personal data of individuals involved in criminal proceedings, be it as witnesses, victims or suspects1. The LED applies to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties2. Article 4 of the LED sets out the principles relating to the processing of personal data, which include lawfulness, fairness, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity and confidentiality3. Article 4 (1) (e) of the LED states that personal data shall be processed lawfully, where processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out by a competent authority for the purposes of the LED, and where processing is based on Union or Member State law which shall meet an objective of general interest, respect the essence of the right to the protection of personal data and be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued3. Therefore, a government can carry out covert investigations involving personal data, as long as it is set forth by law and constitutes a measure that is both necessary and proportionate to the objective of general interest, such as the prevention or prosecution of criminal offences. Reference: 1: CIPP/E study guide, page 1; Data protection in law enforcement2: CIPP/E study guide, page 2; Art. 2 LED3: CIPP/E study guide, page 3; Art. 4 LED.
NEW QUESTION # 66
Which judicial body makes decisions on actions taken by individuals wishing to enforce their rights under EU law?
- A. European Court of Human Rights
- B. European Data Protection Board
- C. Court of Justice of European Union
- D. Court of Auditors
Answer: C
Explanation:
Reference https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice_en
NEW QUESTION # 67
What term BEST describes the European model for data protection?
- A. Self-regulatory
- B. Market-based
- C. Comprehensive
- D. Sectoral
Answer: C
Explanation:
Reference https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-european-strategy-data-19feb2020_en.pdf
NEW QUESTION # 68
Under which of the following conditions does the General Data Protection Regulation NOT apply to the processing of personal data?
- A. When the personal data is processed by an individual only for their household activities
- B. When the personal data is collected and then pseudonymised by the controller
- C. When the personal data is held by the controller but not processed for further purposes
- D. When the personal data is processed only in non-electronic form
Answer: B
Explanation:
Reference https://gdpr-info.eu/art-6-gdpr/
NEW QUESTION # 69
Under Article 58 of the GDPR, which of the following describes a power of supervisory authorities in European Union (EU) member states?
- A. The right to access data for investigative purposes.
- B. The discretion to carry out goals of elected officials within the member state.
- C. The ability to enact new laws by executive order.
- D. The authority to select penalties when a controller is found guilty in a court of law.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Article 58 of the GDPR lists the powers of supervisory authorities in EU member states. Among these powers are the investigative powers, which include the right to access data and information from controllers and processors, as well as to access their premises and equipment. This power enables the supervisory authorities to perform their tasks of monitoring and enforcing the GDPR. The other options are not powers of supervisory authorities under Article 58 of the GDPR. Reference: Art. 58 GDPR - Powers, Article 58 Powers - GDPR, Article 58 GDPR - GDPRhub
NEW QUESTION # 70
In which of the following cases would an organization MOST LIKELY be required to follow both ePrivacy and data protection rules?
- A. When paying a search engine company to give prominence to certain products and services within specific search results.
- B. When creating an untargeted pop-up ad on a website.
- C. When calling a potential customer to notify her of an upcoming product sale.
- D. When emailing a customer to announce that his recent order should arrive earlier than expected.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The ePrivacy Directive (ePD) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are two EU laws that regulate different aspects of personal data processing. The ePD focuses on electronic communications and the use of cookies and similar technologies, while the GDPR covers the broader principles and rights of data protection. Both laws apply to any organization that processes personal data of individuals in the EU, regardless of where the organization is located.
Option D involves both electronic communication and personal data processing, and therefore requires compliance with both ePD and GDPR. Paying a search engine company to give prominence to certain products and services within specific search results implies the use of cookies or similar technologies to track the online behavior of users and target them with personalized ads. This requires the consent of the users under the ePD, as well as the provision of clear and comprehensive information about the purpose and scope of the data processing. Moreover, the organization must comply with the GDPR requirements for data protection by design and by default, data minimization, data security, data subject rights, and accountability.
Option A only involves the use of cookies or similar technologies, and therefore only requires compliance with the ePD. Creating an untargeted pop-up ad on a website does not involve the processing of personal data, as the ad is not based on the online behavior or preferences of the users. However, the organization must still obtain the consent of the users for the use of cookies or similar technologies, and provide them with clear and comprehensive information about the purpose and scope of the data processing.
Option B only involves the processing of personal data, and therefore only requires compliance with the GDPR. Calling a potential customer to notify her of an upcoming product sale involves the collection and use of the customer's personal data, such as name, phone number, and purchase history. The organization must have a lawful basis for the data processing, such as consent, contract, or legitimate interest, and must respect the data subject rights, such as the right to object, the right to access, and the right to erasure.
Option C only involves the processing of personal data, and therefore only requires compliance with the GDPR. Emailing a customer to announce that his recent order should arrive earlier than expected involves the use of the customer's personal data, such as name, email address, and order details. The organization must have a lawful basis for the data processing, such as consent, contract, or legitimate interest, and must respect the data subject rights, such as the right to object, the right to access, and the right to erasure. Reference:
Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 15, section 2.3.3
CIPP/E Certification, page 10, section 1.1.2
Cipp-e Study guides, Class notes & Summaries, document "CIPP/E Exam Summary 2023", page 42, section 2.3.3 ePrivacy: The EU's other data protection rule The New Rules of Data Privacy A guide to GDPR data privacy requirements A guide to the data protection principles
NEW QUESTION # 71
What is one major goal that the OECD Guidelines, Convention 108 and the Data Protection Directive (Directive 95/46/EC) all had in common but largely failed to achieve in Europe?
- A. The restriction of cross-border data flow
- B. The synchronization of approaches to data protection
- C. The creation of legally binding data protection principles
- D. The establishment of a list of legitimate data processing criteria
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 72
Which failing of Privacy Shield, cited by the CJEU as a reason for its invalidation, is the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework intended to address?
- A. Right of Action.
- B. Necessity.
- C. Consent.
- D. Data Subject Rights.
Answer: B
Explanation:
One of the main reasons why the CJEU invalidated the Privacy Shield was that it found that the US surveillance programs were not limited to what is strictly necessary and proportionate, as required by the EU law. The CJEU also criticized the lack of effective judicial remedies for EU data subjects whose data was accessed by US authorities. The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework is intended to address these issues by introducing new safeguards to ensure that signals intelligence activities are necessary and proportionate in the pursuit of defined national security objectives, and by creating a new mechanism for EU individuals to seek redress if they believe they are unlawfully targeted by signals intelligence activities. The Framework also enhances the oversight and transparency of US surveillance practices.
NEW QUESTION # 73
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
TripBliss Inc. is a travel service company which has lost substantial revenue over the last few years. Their new manager, Oliver, suspects that this is partly due to the company's outdated website. After doing some research, he meets with a sales representative from the up-and-coming IT company Techiva, hoping that they can design a new, cutting-edge website for TripBliss Inc.'s foundering business.
During negotiations, a Techiva representative describes a plan for gathering more customer information through detailed Questionaires, which could be used to tailor their preferences to specific travel destinations. TripBliss Inc. can choose any number of data categories - age, income, ethnicity - that would help them best accomplish their goals. Oliver loves this idea, but would also like to have some way of gauging how successful this approach is, especially since the Questionaires will require customers to provide explicit consent to having their data collected. The Techiva representative suggests that they also run a program to analyze the new website's traffic, in order to get a better understanding of how customers are using it. He explains his plan to place a number of cookies on customer devices. The cookies will allow the company to collect IP addresses and other information, such as the sites from which the customers came, how much time they spend on the TripBliss Inc. website, and which pages on the site they visit. All of this information will be compiled in log files, which Techiva will analyze by means of a special program. TripBliss Inc. would receive aggregate statistics to help them evaluate the website's effectiveness. Oliver enthusiastically engages Techiva for these services.
Techiva assigns the analytics portion of the project to longtime account manager Leon Santos. As is standard practice, Leon is given administrator rights to TripBliss Inc.'s website, and can authorize access to the log files gathered from it. Unfortunately for TripBliss Inc., however, Leon is taking on this new project at a time when his dissatisfaction with Techiva is at a high point. In order to take revenge for what he feels has been unfair treatment at the hands of the company, Leon asks his friend Fred, a hobby hacker, for help. Together they come up with the following plan: Fred will hack into Techiva's system and copy their log files onto a USB stick. Despite his initial intention to send the USB to the press and to the data protection authority in order to denounce Techiva, Leon experiences a crisis of conscience and ends up reconsidering his plan. He decides instead to securely wipe all the data from the USB stick and inform his manager that the company's system of access control must be reconsidered.
After Leon has informed his manager, what is Techiva's legal responsibility as a processor?
- A. They must conduct a full systems audit.
- B. They must report it to the supervisory authority.
- C. They must report it to TripBliss Inc.
- D. They must inform customers who have used the website.
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 74
......
Get Special Discount Offer of CIPP-E Certification Exam Sample Questions and Answers: https://troytec.test4engine.com/CIPP-E-real-exam-questions.html